President Abraham
Lincolns use of war powers during the undeclared Civil War
has been questioned. But historians argue that military actions
in circumstances short of declared war are not unusual. There
have been more than two hundred situations in American history
in which the armed forces have been used, and only five when war
was actually declared: the War of 1812, the Mexican-American War,
the Spanish-American War, World War I, and World War II. In all
other cases presidents have used the armed forces on their own
authority, without getting approval from Congress.8 Though the
framers of the Constitution seemed to have expected that decisions
about peace or war would be made by Congress, increasingly presidents
have taken the United States into serious military confrontations
without specific authorization. This tendency appeared most pronounced
in the escalation of the Vietnam War under President Lyndon Johnson.
Doris Kearns Goodwin takes note of this situation in Lyndon
Johnson and the American Dream:
So it happened that
in 1965 Johnson was able to take the American people into a
war that turned out to be the longest in its history, without
a declaration of war or even a specific resolution of support
from the U.S. Congress. Advisers led to bombs and bombs led
to troops and gradually America was at war with North Vietnam.
And the Congress was called upon simply to recognize the situation
and support the Presidents actions.9
When Lyndon Johnson
left office and President Richard Nixon began the de-escalation
of American troops in Vietnam, some 540,000 U.S. soldiers were
there, certainly numbers suggesting a serious military commitment.
In the Nixon presidency, members of Congress were troubled by
Nixons potential for expanding the war into other theaters.
They were particularly disturbed when they found that he had
ordered secret bombing raids on Cambodia, attacks that continued
for some fourteen months prior to the open incursion in May
1970 to "destroy staging areas" of the North Vietnamese
Army. Apparently the Cambodian government had been cooperative
with the bombing missions, despite a position of neutrality.
Nixon had privately notified a few "hawkish"
congressman whose approval could be expected.
Congressional
Tug
The "doves"
in Congress had long opposed the expansion of these war-making
powers by Presidents Johnson and Nixon. After failing eight
times to override Nixons presidential veto, Congress finally
mustered enough votes to pass its own restriction on the war-making
powers of the president in November 1973. It was called the
War Powers Resolution
The War Powers Resolution
was enacted to "insure that the collective judgment of
both the Congress and the president would apply to the introduction
of United States armed forces into hostilities." According
to the resolution, the president is restricted in war making
to situations in which (1) Congress has declared war; (2) Congress
has given the president specific statutory permission to use
armed forces; or (3), the territories, armed forces, or possessions
of the United States have been attacked.10
Further, the president
is required "in every possible instance" to consult
with Congress before sending U.S. armed forces into hostilities.
After he has done so, he is to consult Congress on a regular
basis until the forces have been removed. He is required to
report to Congress within forty-eight hours of committing troops.
Under the law, the president is given a maximum of sixty days
to use the forces with congressional approval, and then he has
to obtain either a declaration of war or some other means of
approval from the legislative body.11
 |
|
President
Reagan meets with Congress on the invasion of Grenada.
Ronald Reagan Library
|
Presidential Tug
Most presidents since the War Powers Resolution was enacted
have opposed it on some grounds, including these:
- Presidents
claim that they can make these military decisions based
on their own constitutional authority as commander in chief;
- They argue
that their duty to see that the laws are faithfully executed
gives them an "international police power" to
make sure other nations pay their debts, protect U.S. lives
and property abroad (including ensuring the safety of embassies),
and abide by international law.
- They argue
the president has specific power to put down insurrection
within the United States.
- They point
out that the president executes treaty commitments, and
some treaties require the United States to guarantee the
security of other nations (the NATO agreement, for example).
- They argue
that in a nuclear age, split-second timing makes it unrealistic
to assume that Congress could participate in a decision
to use nuclear weapons.
Activity:
Below are situations
in which U.S. presidents used their war powers to send or withdraw
troops since the passage of the War Powers Resolution in 1973.
Your task is to:
1. Find as much
information about the presidents role in one of
these military actions. (A good place to check is a full-length
biography of one of these presidents, since there you are likely
to get better coverage of the events mentioned below. Click
on the bibliography [link] for some examples.] Also,
since these are fairly recent events, you may find information
about them in the Guide to Periodical Literature in your
library.
2. Determine
if the president did in fact invoke the War Powers Resolution
in this situation.
3. Make a judgment
based on your study of the War Powers Resolution, relevant Constitutional
provisions, and the arguments stated above, as to whether you
think the presidents action was constitutional and appropriate.
4. Prepare a
presentation that includes the elements listed below. So your
classmates can use this information for a follow-up activity,
if possible provide them with a briefing sheet that includes
information on each of the following:
The date and circumstance
of the action
The presidents
stated reason for the action
The presidents
use of the War Powers Resolution
The extent of the
action, in time, money, and personnel
The success of
the action (both militarily and politically)
The publics
response to the action
Your opinion as
to whether the presidents action was justified
A follow-up
1. Using what
you have learned from your study of the presidents use
of war powers and the briefing sheets provided by your classmates,
write an essay assessing the validity of the following statement:
Although the Constitution
grants Congress the power to declare war and to raise and support
armies, the president, as commander in chief, has the exclusive
power to wage war and to command and control the armed forces
in both peace and war. Since one power is incomplete without
the other, the Framers of the Constitution must have intended
that military action represent the collective judgment of the
Congress and the President.12
2. Keep in mind
that two congressional committees receive any communications
from the president when he invokes the War Powers Resolution:
the House Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Senate Foreign
Relations Committee. Visit the Senate or House website (www.senate.gov
or www.house.gov)
to determine the name of the current chair of one of those committees.
Write to that senator or congressman and ask for information
regarding how the War Powers Resolution has affected the work
of his or her committee. Ask specific questions relating to
the presidential actions reviewed in the class presentations.
When you hear
from the senator or congressman, share your findings with the
class.
3. In a culminating
discussion consider this question: What is the future of the
War Powers Resolution?
Presidential
Military Commitments: Examples
President
Gerald Ford
April 1975: President Ford directed U.S. participation
in an international humanitarian effort to transport refugees
from Danang and other seaports to safer areas in Vietnam. He
also used armed forces to assist in the evacuation of Cambodia
and South Vietnam.
May 15, 1975: President
Ford ordered U.S. armed forces to recapture the SS Mayaguez,
a merchant vessel en route from Hong Kong to Thailand with a
U.S. citizen crew, after it was seized by Cambodian communists
in international waters.
President Jimmy
Carter
April 26, 1980 President
Carter approved what proved to be an unsuccessful mission to
rescue the American hostages held in Tehran, Iran.
President
Ronald Reagan
1981 After
a guerilla offensive against the government of El Salvador,
President Reagan sent additional U.S. military advisers there,
bringing the total to approximately fifty-five. They were to
offer training in counterinsurgency.
March 1982 President
Reagan authorized U.S. military personnel to be used in the
Sinai as part of the multinational forces and observers helping
execute the peace treaty between Egypt and Israel, a product
of the 1979 Camp David Accord.
August 1982 President
Reagan deployed eight hundred marines to serve in the multinational
force to assist the Palestine Liberation Front in withdrawing
from Lebanon.
September 1982 President
Reagan authorized a marine contingent of 1,200 men to be used
as part of a temporary multinational force to help restore the
Lebanese government. The marines were to serve for an unspecified
time as an "interposition force" that would not "engage
in combat."
October 1983 President
Reagan deployed approximately 1,900 marines and army airborne
troops into Grenada at the request of five members of the Organization
of Eastern Caribbean States. Approximately 1,000 U.S. citizens,
mostly students, were reported to be on the island and some
U.S. officials were concerned that they might be harmed or taken
hostage.
Spring 1986 President
Reagan ordered American naval forces to stage exercises in the
Mediterranean, off the coast of Libya, whose radical leader,
Muammar Quaddafi, was generally believed to be a principal sponsor
of terrorism. When Libyan forces apparently harassed the Americans,
U.S. bombers launched a series of retaliatory attacks on Libyan
positions. A few weeks later a more extensive bombing raid was
ordered on the Libyan capital.
President
George Bush
1989 President
Bush sent an invasion force of 14,000 troops into Panama, where
13,000 American troops were already based. The invasion attained
its goal of ousting Manuel Noriega, a leader once favored by
the United States but now in trouble for drug-trafficking and
repressive methods of governing, and putting into power the
opposition leader Guillermo Endara.
December 1989 President
Bush reported that on December 1, U.S. fighter planes from Clark
Air Base in the Philippines had assisted the pro-American Aquino
government to repel a coup attempt. In addition, 100 marines
were sent from the U.S. Navy base at Subic Bay to protect the
U.S. embassy in Manila.
January 1991 In
August 1990, Iraqi troops, at the order of dictator Saddam Hussein,
invaded Kuwait and annexed it into Iraq. The United Nations
voted strong sanctions against Iraq. The U.S. Navy was authorized
to institute a blockade of Iraq to cut off oil exports. When
Hussein would not reverse his actions, at President Bushs
request, Congress voted on January 16, 1991, to support a military
action against Iraq, called Operation Desert Storm.
May 1991 President
Bush stated in a status report to Congress that the Iraqi repression
of the Kurdish people had necessitated a limited introduction
of U.S. forces into northern Iraq for emergency relief purposes.
December 1992 President
Bush reported that he had deployed U.S. armed forces to Somalia
in response to a humanitarian crisis and a UN Security Council
Resolution determining that the situation constituted a threat
to international peace.
President
Bill Clinton
April 1993 President
Clinton reported that U.S. forces were participating in a NATO
air action to enforce a UN ban on all unauthorized military
flights over Bosnia-Herzegovina.
June 1993 President
Clinton reported that in response to attacks against UN forces
in Somalia by a factional leader, the U.S. Quick Reaction Force
in the area had participated in military action to end the violence.
June 1993 President
Clinton reported that on June 26 U.S. naval forces had launched
missiles against the Iraqi Intelligence Services headquarters
in Baghdad in response to an unsuccessful effort to assassinate
former President Bush in Kuwait in April 1993.
Note: The source
of information for the military commitments is Ellen C. Colliers
"Instances of Use of United States Forces Abroad, 1789-1993,"
found at:
http://sun00781.dn.net/man/crs/crs_931007.htm.